November 18, 2011
Also known as the Peggy Bundy Act.
Is it a wise legal precedent to require sex in a relationship?
“But your honor, it wasn’t rape, I had to have sex with her. It’s the law!”
And by putting a monetary value on sex, has this judge made all wives de facto prostitutes?
There’s a lot more to say but I am not sure the question is Imponderable. However, it does give me a headache.
At any rate, this is yet another great argument against marriage. Way to go, France.
I have been saying for years that, one way or another, every man pays for sex. Oh, not always in money, but in some way, somehow, no sex is free.
The guys reading this know what I’m talking about.
Now thanks to this judge, not having sex costs a guy too.
What the Hell was James Brown thinking when he sang “It’s a Man’s World?”
The question is Imponderable.
But I bet I’d understand it if I were Soul Brother Number One.
Mr. Blog's Tepid Ride 
So: having sex is not free, not having sex is not free, either, so what’s left? Is there any tax on masturbation, too, perhaps? >__>’
LikeLike
This was AWESOME!!!
LikeLike