This is a post where I get annoyingly obsessive about Dracula.

1 Oct

October 1, 2014

Hey, you read the title. You’ve been warned.

I’m really annoyed by the marketing campaign for the upcoming movie Dracula Untold. It claims to be the true origin story of Dracula. Of course, it is all nonsense.

Dracula-Untold-lee von count

The character we know as Dracula is a fictional vampire created in 1897 by Bram Stoker. In the novel, which takes place in the 19th century, Dracula has been a vampire for a great many years, yet little is revealed about his past. Through the passage of time, the character has become linked to the real-life tyrant Vlad Tepes, also known as Vlad the Impaler, who took that name “Dracul” when he joined a satanic order in the 1400’s.

There is no basis for this link at all. None is provided in the book.

However, Bram Stoker became passingly familiar with the Tepes legend as he wrote his book and used a version of his name (“Dracul” became “Dracula,” and in fact a branch of the Tepes family uses a variation of that name) for his creation.

And that’s it.

In fact, the original name of the character was going to be the laughable “Count Wampyr.” (As you can guess, “wampyr” means “vampire” in German. So we were spared from Count Vampire.)

Now this movie comes along and I have nothing against it, other than it stars yet another pretty-boy, bare-chested, tormented vampire designed to appeal to the Twilight crowd. But this movie claims to provide the link between Vlad Tepes and the vampire Dracula.

I need to tell you right up front that this is fiction and they can do whatever they want. Dracula (character and book) are public domain and anyone can make any variation of the legend they so desire. I’m fine with that.

But Vlad Tepes is such an amazing historical personage (hey, he didn’t get the name The Impaler for nothing, he earned it) that any movie based on his life can skip anything having to do with vampires. This guy once invited his enemies to dinner to talk peace, then locked them in and set fire to the building. So he was a bad ass without having to wear fangs. He was as brutal and bloodthirsty as any fictional vampire, and he didn’t have to turn into a bat or sleep in a coffin.

I guess what it comes down to is that if the movie is a hit with the brain cell-challenged Twilight crowd, this is going to define the “origin” and “history” of Count Dracula for years to come. It is going to taint the legends of Vlad Tepes and muddy the Stoker tale. Dumb kids will think this shirtless angst-ridden dude is what Count Dracula was and is, when in fact, just for example, both the fictional Count and the real-life Impaler were much older men. And attractive? Read the section where Stoker described the Count’s hairy palms and unibrow.

I just don’t want this teenage fantasy to become Dracula. I want Dracula to stay Dracula.

If you stuck with me to the end, sorry for being so annoying.

 

.

Advertisements

6 Responses to “This is a post where I get annoyingly obsessive about Dracula.”

  1. T E Stazyk October 1, 2014 at 4:59 am #

    Yes! Everytime a bus goes by with an ad for that movie I scream “Why???”

    Have you heard of this? An important part of vampire history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varney_the_Vampire

    Like

    • bmj2k October 1, 2014 at 6:09 am #

      I have that book but I’ve barely read any of it.

      Like

  2. Matt Cowan October 1, 2014 at 12:13 pm #

    Well put! This movie doesn’t look like it will be scary in the slightest either. I’m not planning on watching it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bmj2k October 1, 2014 at 1:05 pm #

      I think you just hit the biggest problem with that film. It looks like it is going for style over substance. The whirling bats look good, but that may the film’s only appeal.

      Like

  3. J.R.D. Skinner October 1, 2014 at 2:47 pm #

    I think this is all part of Universal’s attempt to “reboot” their classic monster stable from the ’30s and ’40s, but, as one of the guys who loves those flicks, this smells of miserable failure – as did I, Frankenstein.

    Like

    • bmj2k October 1, 2014 at 4:06 pm #

      Even go back to Van Helsing. Universal seems to be mistaking “action” for “horror.” There’s very little action in either the original Frankenstein or Dracula, but plenty of mood, atmosphere, and tension.

      Like

Have something to say? Let's hear it!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: