Archive | superstition RSS feed for this section

In Search of… The Loch Ness Monster

7 Oct

October 7, 2010

This is the second of an occasional October series of reports focusing on real life monsters and cryptoids. The first can be found HERE.

Perhaps the most well-known cryptoid, the Loch Ness Monster is perhaps also the most well-known resident of Scotland. Known as “Nessie,” the alleged creature has been reliably spotted since 1933, but reports go back as far as the 7th Century, when Saint Columba, then known simply as “Columba the Monk, who will become a saint some years after his death,” walked along the shores of the River Ness and saved a man from being eaten by a river beast. Skeptics, however, claim that this sort of thing comes up over and over in the narratives of medieval saints, so either this sort of thing happened all the time or there was a lack of imagination among medieval writers.

Loch Ness is a large lake, (“loch” being the Scottish word for “lake”) named after Elliot Ness (1903-1957) who was of Norwegian descent but had a good television show based on his life. The most striking feature of the lake, aside from the fact that the water is murky and the lake nearly dead, is the ancient castle that juts out and looms large, not only above the lake, but in Loch Ness Monster lore.

Castle Urquhart was built in the 13th Century. Although all that remain today are ruins, in its prime the castle was a grand palace, with hourly dances by colorfully costumed characters and nightly fireworks displays. The castle’s first owner, the Lord Disney Urquhart, soon opened castles across Scotland, and Urquhartland was soon followed by Urquhart World and, later, Euro Urquhart, which closed after only a few years of operation.

From the children's book "Dick and Jane go to Loch Ness."

Today it exists as a tourist attraction where the locals sell lots of tacky souvenirs to visitors. It was from the area of the castle in 1934 that the most famous picture of the Loch Ness Monster was taken.

It became known simply as “The Surgeon’s Photograph,” because the man who took it, a surgeon named Dr. Edward Surgeon, did not want his name attached to it due to the affect it may have on his reputation. It purports to show the head and neck of the beast.

This has become the most famous photo taken of the creature, and also the most analyzed. Hundreds of scientists, thousands of hours, millions of dollars have been spent on just this one photo, and recently the effort has paid off, as we can now share the results of the extensive investigation.

Nessie has been described in many ways, but the most common description includes a long neck, a serpentine body, and fins. Moving in the water, it may seem to undulate, or to have humps. Some witnesses claim that it can leave the water and eats local farm stock. Still others claim that it creeps into their bedrooms at night and “makes sweet sweet love” to them.

But what is The Loch Ness Monster? Most people seem to believe that it is some sort of remnant, a prehistoric leftover, if you will. Most theories contend that it seems to match the fossil record of a plesiosaur, an extinct dinosaur. These people go on and on about this, especially when tourists come from America just to see the monster and buy these “experts” pints at the local pub.

Let me set the record straight with these actual facts that you can verify yourself if you don’t believe me, which may be a smart idea.

1- The plesiosaur was cold-blooded and could never live in the loch’s water. It is too cold.
2- The loch is relatively young. During the last ice age it was frozen, top to bottom, and remained that way for around 20,000 years.
3- There is not enough food to support such a large creature. The loch is murky and sunlight does not reach far down. It has a very small ecosystem and supports only a small colony of fish.

But what is it?

Scientists sweep the lake on a regular basis looking for the creature. They use the latest equipment, with high-tech sonar being among the fore due to the extreme lack of visibility in the lake.

One recent theory has become known as the “Incredible Mr. Nessie” theory.

This has become the prevailing theory. Scientists contend that, as World War Two raged, a sailor decided that, for the war effort, he could best serve his country by becoming a sea monster.

 

This man became Mr. Nessie, The Loch Ness Monster. Of course, top government officials deny this story, but like anything the government denies, it is assumed to be true.

Mr. Nessie the Loch Ness Monster was America’s top secret weapon against the menace of Scottish Nazi U-Boats patrolling Loch Ness. Using his incredible skills, Mr. Nessie remained unseen throughout his career, but helped lead the allies to victory. Not a single American craft was sunk in Loch Ness during World War Two and that is an indisputable fact.

People still search for the monster today, misidentifying everything from trees and boats to elephants and ugly children for the monster. New theories abound. The monster may be anything from an eel to a hoax to Rupert Murdoch. Even the old standby swamp gas has been thrown into the mix. However, we are no closer to an answer today than we were on May 2nd, 1933, when George Spicer and his wife claimed to see “a dragon or pre-historic creature” prowling around the lake. “Holy shit!” he was quoted as saying in the Inverness Courier, and don’t think that didn’t get them into trouble.

Reports of The Loch Ness Monster have petered out in recent years. Tourists still throng to the lake hoping to catch a glimpse, scientists still zoom around the lake and piss off local fishermen, Castle Urquhart still remains a tourist trap, but the monster himself remains notoriously camera shy.

We think he has better things to do.

In Search of… The Chupacabra

5 Oct

October 5, 2010

This is the first of an occasional October series of reports focusing on real life monsters and cryptoids. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

In 1995, a series of strange animal deaths caused widespread panic across the farms and rural areas of Puerto Rico. In the initial attacks, eight sheep were found dead, with strange puncture wounds across their bodies. Later, other farm animals and household pets were found dead the same way. In each case, the carcasses were totally drained of blood.

These were the first reports of the Chupacabra, the infamous goat sucking beast.

Why goat sucker? The name was coined by comedian Silverio Pérez, thereby ensuring that no one would take this seriously. Funny guy, that Silverio. In later years he became a motivational speaker. “Hi! I’m Silverio Perez! You may know me as the guy who coined the term goat sucker!” Despite that, he remains a successful entertainer.  (Reports that he named the beast after his mother-in-law are unconfirmed.)

What is a chupacabra? Is it real? How drunk do you have to be to see one?

Chupacabra sightings have been on the upswing across the southwestern United States. Reports vary, but the first descriptions painted the picture of a medium sized, short haired, angry dog.

witness description of chupacabra

witness description of chupacabra

However descriptions vary, from a reptilian type of large fanged dog to a more humanoid form. Often, photos of alleged chupacabras show a hairless dog, possibly suffering from mange.

RECENT REPORTED CHUPACABRA SIGHTINGS

  • In July 2004, a rancher near San Antonio, Texas, killed a hairless dog-like creature, which was attacking his livestock. This animal was later determined to be a coyote.
  • In mid-August 2006, Michelle O’Donnell of Turner, Maine, described an “evil looking” rodent-like animal with fangs that had been found dead alongside a road.
  • On January 11, 2008, a sighting was reported at the province of Capiz in the Philippines. Some of the residents from the barangay believed that it was the chupacabras that killed eight chickens. The owner of the chickens saw a dog-like animal attacking his chickens. It was most likely a dog.

Rare surveillance footage of a chupacabra attack

POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS

  • a genetically mutated coyote
  • NASA experiments
  • vampires
  • “Bigfoot with fangs”
  • those darn teenagers

THE EXPERTS SPEAK

  • Loren Coleman is comfortable with the wild dog explanation. A noted expert in unidentified creatures, or “cryptoids,” Coleman has investigated hundreds of chupacabra cases. He finds no evidence of any strange or supernatural creatures.
  • CNN’s Ed Lavandera has described the chupacabras as the “Bigfoot of Latino culture.” I’m not sure who should be more insulted by that report, Latino culture or CNN.
  • In July 2008, History’s Monster Quest series featured some Texas carcasses, which were determined to be dogs and coyotes

Despite all the evidence to the contrary, there still remain believers. In the words of an eyewitness “I’m not messing around with this thing any more!”