Archive | July, 2011

Imponderable #8: Mt. Tabor Oregon

27 Jul

July 27, 2011

Doesn’t Portland have a filtration system in their reservoir? Actually, it does not, which seems a little reckless when you consider that they had an e coli scare in 2009 and everyone was told to boil their water. It seems that the unfiltered nature of the water was an unspoken secret that only came to light in 2008 when a pair of skinny dippers were found having fun in the water.

It is a fact, admitted by the Water Bureau administrator, that crap gets into the water supply all the time. I am not even talking about illegal dumping or anything man-made, I am talking about dead animals, sick fish, ground toxins, and yes, animal waste and pee. That is a fact and it is assumed and even expected. Strangely, rather than a way to treat or filter the water, which may be expensive but would be practical since it could be done at one central location as water leaves the reservoir, the city floated plans to cover the reservoir, at a cost of $500 million.

According to The Big Book of Boy Stuff by Bart King, an average man pees about 1 to 2 quarts per day. So assuming the drunk peed the limit, that would make 2 quarts of pee diluted in 7.2 million gallons of water. Or 1 quart of pee to every 14.4 million quarts of water. That means that every quart of water from that reservoir would be 1/14,400,000 pee. In other words, that is 6.944 X 10 to the power of -8 percent. This is far, far less than the proverbial drop in the bucket. It is a molecule in the bucket.

Compare this to the FDA guidelines for peanut butter. BEWARE, this is disgusting. The FDA allows an average of 30 or more insect fragments per 100 grams and an average of 1 or more rodent hairs per 100 grams. That makes the drunk peeing in the reservoir positively hygienic by comparison.

So is the Water Bureau administrator over-reacting? After all, the two people who skinny dipped in the reservoir didn’t cause him to dump the water, and who knows what kind of bodily fluids they released?

In this era of droughts is it wise to dump 7.2 million gallons of water?

In this economic climate is it wise to waste $35,000 to dump effectively clean water? I admit that no, I don’t want to be drinking anyone’s pee, but at one part per fourteen million I don’t think I am. Consider that the EPA allows up to 7 asbestos fibers per liter of water. Asbestos is a known carcinogen.

Is one quart of human pee worse than the probably thousands of quarts of animal pee and possibly infected waste that goes into the reservoir?

Granted that the reservoir is in the middle of public parkland, how many people have already peed in the water over the years?

The question is Imponderable.

Imponderable #7: Alameda California

26 Jul

July 26, 2011

Have we gotten to the point where bureaucracy values red tape over human lives? I think we hit that point long ago but here is stark proof.

Had two guys playing volleyball on the beach saw the man in the water and rushed in to save him we’d be applauding them as heroes, but paid rescuers could only stand on the beach and watch the man die. Why? Red tape.

How can these people live with themselves?

When asked by a reporter if he would go in the water to save a child, the Fire Department Chief answered “Well, if I was off-duty I would know what I would do, but I think you’re asking me my on-duty response and I would have to stay within our policies and procedures because that’s what’s required by our department to do.”

In other words, if he was off-duty sure, he’d rescue the baby. No problem! But once he goes on duty and assumes the responsibilities of a first responder, someone who’s very job is to save lives, he’d let the child drown.

This is the world that lawyers have given us.

I remind you that the suicidal man was standing in obviously gentle surf for an entire hour. The police and firemen watched for an hour, and it took an onlooker to retrieve the body.

And the Chief’s final word? “I think the sensibility would be probably that we’re going to evaluate our response protocols.”

There is no “sensibility” here. None at all.

How could police and fire fighters stand on a beach for an entire hour and watch a man die?

How could they suppress every human urge to save a life, a life that could have been saved with minimal danger to themselves?

The question is Imponderable

And disgusting.