Imponderable #65: Clayton Cubitt

19 Oct

October 19, 2012

Going against the tradition of The Imponderable, Clayton Cubitt is not a place, he is a man. Read on.

And now, purely in the interest of science and research, are his videos.

WARNING: NOT SAFE FOR WORK.
And please, be over 18. While there is NO nudity or profanity here, this is not for kids.

I decided that it was in the best traditions of journalism that I present all four videos. And how about that Alicia? If those girls don’t make you a fan of literature I don’t what will. And if you are a true cosmopolitan bibliophile, follow the links at the end of the videos for foreign versions.

And as far as mocking a Victorian theory of hysteria in women, give me a break. Some guys will say anything to get a woman to do some things. The man, btw, lives in my neck of the woods, Brooklyn NY. I would love to run into him some day.

I did some research into this (in the name of journalistic integrity) and the women are either burlesque performers or adult movie stars, and what is going on below the table is probably just what you think is going on below the table. This is real.

But what is it? Art? Well, I guess it is, if only in the sense that everything today is art. Is it a statement? The artist seems to think so but I don’t believe him.

Is this simply the extreme that a man will go to just to get a sexual thrill?

The question is Imponderable. But the answer is probably yes.

You watched all four of those videos, didn’t you? 😉

14 Responses to “Imponderable #65: Clayton Cubitt”

  1. Thomas Stazyk October 19, 2012 at 12:50 am #

    Yes, but is it art?

    (PS–I think they’re faking it!)

    Like

    • bmj2k October 19, 2012 at 6:07 am #

      Maybe they are faking it, but so what? Lol…
      Is it art? Much as I want to say no, the definition of art has been strained as to include anything from self-mutilation to empty rooms, so yes, this is, somehow, art.

      Like

  2. zathra October 19, 2012 at 2:07 am #

    Hmmmm….. Alicia, Danielle & Stormy all gave VERY GOOD reads. They were pretty good at trying to stay composed, cool, calm & collected. Stoya was o.k., but she didn’t do that well.
    I’ll watch it again a few times to re – evaluate all of them…..

    Clayton Cubitt – I doff my chapeau to you, sir. Interesting work.

    Like

    • bmj2k October 19, 2012 at 6:09 am #

      He is a true pioneer in his field.

      Like

      • zathra October 19, 2012 at 6:14 am #

        I think I would call this performance art. In some ways probably better than Cirque du Soleil or the Blue Man Group, or even Pilobolus ( Big in the 80’s ). I found his Youtube channel & subscribed. Another reason to keep my ” nephews ” away from my computer.

        Like

        • bmj2k October 19, 2012 at 9:20 am #

          The Blue Man Group never impressed me.

          Like

          • zathra October 19, 2012 at 12:53 pm #

            They need to get some Blue Women ( AVATAR joke ? ).

            Like

            • bmj2k October 19, 2012 at 2:09 pm #

              Now you have my interest.

              Like

              • zathra October 19, 2012 at 3:02 pm #

                Bwahaha !! Blue Women reading while being ” distracted “.
                This isn’t overtly pornographic, but to anyone but a Trappist monk or Orthodox Christian hermit, it’s pretty clear what’s happening….. 😉

                Like

                • bmj2k October 19, 2012 at 3:50 pm #

                  It is not pornographic at all with the volume down, which is funny since pornography is mainly a visual medium.

                  Like

                  • zathra October 19, 2012 at 4:01 pm #

                    True – If I mute the sound, I just wonder what the hell’s going on…..

                    Like

  3. TexasTrailerParkTrash October 19, 2012 at 10:03 pm #

    To paraphrase the lady in the restaurant watching Meg Ryan in “When Harry Met Sally”: I’ll have what they’re having.

    Like

  4. Figaro January 23, 2019 at 9:40 am #

    So a 16 or 17-year-old mustn’t see moaning women? Typical American-prude way of thinking! You sell real weapons to children, but “protect” them from clothed, pretty women who have an orgasm. I am very much of the opinion that young people in particular should see that women can also have orgasms, and that this is something beautiful.

    Apart from that, however, I am convinced that these videos are fakes. It is not a problem to fake an orgasm. And I can’t imagine that women find it exciting to be gazed at and stimulated by strange men while they are filmed by a camera.

    Like

Have something to say? Let's hear it!